Liu v. Iconoclast Fitness, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 24, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-00525·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC # RACHAEL LIU, Individually and On Behalf DATE FILED: 9/24/2024 of All Others Similarly Situated, ——————— Plaintiff, 23-cv-525 (MKV) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL ICONOCLAST FITNESS, INC. and NGO OKAFOR, Defendants.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter, filed by defense counsel, stating that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 45]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by October 24, 2024. Ifno such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). SO ORDERED. | / a Date: September 24, 2024 MARY md vvsypaird New York, NY United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liu v. Iconoclast Fitness, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Liu v. Iconoclast Fitness, Inc. (Liu v. Iconoclast Fitness, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Muze Inc. v. Digital on Demand, Inc.
356 F.3d 492 (Second Circuit, 2004)