Liu v. City of Reno

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * *

4 FRANK LIU, Case No. 3:22-CV-00551-ART-CLB

5 Plaintiff, ORDER

6 v.

7 CITY OF RENO, et. al.,

8 Defendants.

9 10 On December 13, 2022, Plaintiff Frank Liu (“Liu) initiated this action by filing an 11 application to proceed in forma pauperis and along with a pro se civil rights complaint, 12 (ECF Nos. 1, 1-1). Liu asserted claims for (1) violation of the Eighth Amendment as it 13 relates to Martin v. City of Boise, 920 F.3d 584 (9th Cir. 2019); (2) violation of the Fourth 14 Amendment as it relates to Terry v. Ohio; and (3) violation of the Fourteenth Amendment 15 as it relates to “racial profiling… without due process” against Defendants City of Reno 16 and Scott Gauthier. (ECF No. 4 at 5, 13.) On December 22, 2022, the Court issued a 17 screening order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, granting Liu an opportunity to either 18 amend his complaint or proceed on the complaint as stated in the Screening Order (ECF 19 No. 3). The Court allowed Liu to proceed on his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment claims 20 against Defendant Gauthier and additionally granted leave to amend on the Eighth 21 Amendment claim and dismissed, without prejudice, Defendant City of Reno. (Id.) On 22 January 27, 2023, Liu filed his amended complaint. (ECF No. 9.) 23 Having reviewed the amended complaint, the Court finds as follow: Liu has alleged 24 sufficient facts to proceed against the City of Reno on a Monell claim based on its policies 25 and customs related to the homeless population in relation to the Fourth and Fourteenth 26 Amendment claims, as discussed in the original screening order (See ECF No. 3). Finally, 27 in reviewing the Eighth Amendment claim, the Court finds Liu has not properly amended 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Liu will PROCEED against 2| Defendants City of Reno and Reno Police Department Officer Scott Gauthier (“Gauthier”) on the following claims: (1) violation of the Fourth Amendment as it relates to Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 19 (1968); and (2) violation of the Fourteenth Amendment as it relates 5 | to “racial profiling... without due process.” 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall ISSUE summons for the above- 7 | named defendants and deliver the same to the U.S. Marshal together with a copy of the 8 | complaint, (ECF No. 9), the screening order, (ECF No. 3), and this order for service on the defendant. The Clerk shall SEND to Liu two USM-285 forms. Liu shall have until March 1, 2023, to complete the USM-285 service forms and return them to the U.S. 11 Marshal, 400 S. Virginia Street, 2"? Floor, Reno, Nevada 89501. If Liu fails to follow this 12 order, the above-named defendants will be dismissed for failure to complete service of process pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). 14 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that henceforth, Liu shall serve upon Defendants or, 15 | if appearance has been entered by counsel, upon the attorney(s) a copy of every 16 pleading, motion, or other document submitted for consideration by the Court. Liu shall 17 | include with the original paper to be filed with the Clerk of the Court a certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of the document was mailed to the Defendants or 19 counsel for defendants. The Court may disregard any paper received by a District Judge 20 | Magistrate Judge which has not been filed with the Clerk of the Court, and any paper 21| received by a District Judge, Magistrate Judge, or Clerk of the Court which does not 22 | include a certificate of service. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 8, 2023 * 25 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28