Litz v. Saint Consulting Group, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Litz v. Saint Consulting Group, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 772 F.3d 1 →

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided November 7, 2014·No. 13-2437·Errata

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 13-2437

CRYSTAL LITZ, and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

THE SAINT CONSULTING GROUP, INC.; P. MICHAEL SAINT; PATRICK F. FOX,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on November 4, 2014, is amended as follows:

On page 7, line 3, the word "variation's" is changed to "variations."

On page 9, line 19, the words "hourly pay" are changed to "a stipend."

On page 10, line 13, the word "variation's" is changed to "variations."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 13-2437

CRYSTAL LITZ, and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

THE SAINT CONSULTING GROUP, INC.; P. MICHAEL SAINT; PATRICK F. FOX,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on November 4, 2014, is amended as follows:

On page 7, line 3, the word "variation's" is changed to "variations."

On page 9, line 19, the words "hourly pay" are changed to "a stipend."

On page 10, line 13, the word "variation's" is changed to "variations."

Litz v. Saint Consulting Group, Inc., (1st Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Litz v. Saint Consulting Group, Inc. (Litz v. Saint Consulting Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.