Litz v. Johnston
This text of 46 A. 776 (Litz v. Johnston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[170]*170The opinion of the court was delivered by
The object of this proceeding is to exempt from taxation a certain building and the land connected with it. There are two prosecutors—Ferdinand Litz, in whom the legal title is vested, and the Missionary Society of the Most Holy Redeemer, of the State of Hew York, commonly known as the Redemptorists Fathers, in whom is the equitable estate. The ground of exemption is that the land and buildings are “used exclusively for charitable purposes.” Gen. Stat., p. 3320.
The society in question was incorporated by the State of Hew York, and is one of a religious order whose head is at Romel Ferdinand Litz was the provincial (or local head) of the order in the United States at the time he took the title to this land, which was paid for with the money of the society in whose favor Litz made the declaration of trust that has been exhibited in the testimony. 'The purposes of this order are charitable. Whether we regard the free education of the young, or the conducting of religious services, or the furnishing' of spiritual aid and material assistance to a missionary priesthood, all the objects to which this order has devoted this land are exclusively charitable in the sense in which our taxing law has been applied. Sisters of Charity v. Township of Chatham, 23 Vroom 373; Trustees v. Paterson, 32 Id. 420; Cooper Hospital v. Burdsall, 34 Id. 85; Paterson Rescue Mission v. High, Receiver, 35 Id. 116.
The circumstance that the legal title is in a trustee and that the cestui que trust owes its corporate existence to the laws of a sister state do not militate against the general policy of our state embodied in the act referred to.
The assessment is set aside.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 A. 776, 65 N.J.L. 169, 1900 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/litz-v-johnston-nj-1900.