Litwin v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co.

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedJanuary 25, 2024
Docket2:23-cv-01885
StatusUnknown

This text of Litwin v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co. (Litwin v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Litwin v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co., (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAN LITWIN, Case No.: 2:23-cv-01885-DJC-KJN 12 Plaintiff(s), 13 v. SCHEDULING ORDER 14 WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES 15 Defendant(s). 16 17 I. SERVICE OF PROCESS 18 The named defendant has been served as required by Federal Rule of Civil 19 Procedure 5. No further service is permitted without leave of the Court, good cause 20 having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). 21 II. JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES / AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS 22 No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without 23 leave of the Court, good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson 24 v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 27 604 (9th Cir. 1992). 25 III. DISCOVERY PROCEDURES 26 Discovery matters that do not implicate the schedule of the case or that do not 27 relate to sealing or redaction of documents related to dispositive motions are referred 28 to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge, who will hear all discovery disputes 1 subject to his or her procedures. All discovery documents must include the words 2 “DISCOVERY MATTER” in the caption to ensure proper routing. Do not direct delivery 3 of courtesy copies of these documents to the District Judge. Counsel are directed to 4 review and comply with the case management procedures of the assigned Magistrate 5 Judge when setting applicable discovery matters for hearing. All motions to compel 6 discovery must be noticed on the assigned Magistrate Judge’s calendar in 7 accordance with the local rules of this Court and the Magistrate Judge’s own 8 procedures. 9 The written ruling of the assigned Magistrate Judge shall be final, subject to 10 modification by the District Judge only where it has been shown that the Magistrate 11 Judge’s order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). 12 Pursuant to Local Rule 303, any party may file and serve a “Request for 13 Reconsideration by the District Judge of Magistrate Judge’s Ruling.” See L.R. 303(c). 14 The requesting party must file and serve any such request within fourteen (14) days of 15 service of a written ruling. L.R. 303(b). The request must specify which portions of the 16 ruling are clearly erroneous or contrary to law and the basis for that contention with 17 supporting points and authorities. L.R. 303(c). 18 In addition, the assigned Magistrate Judge reviews proposed discovery phase 19 protective orders sought by the parties pursuant to Local Rule 141.1. However, 20 requests to seal or redact in connection with dispositive motions or trial are decided 21 by Judge Calabretta and any such requests must comply with Judge Calabretta’s 22 Standing Order and Local Rules 140 and 141. 23 IV. DISCOVERY DEADLINES 24 A. Rule 26(a) Initial Disclosures 25 If not already completed, all parties appearing shall make initial disclosures 26 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 26(a)(1) within fourteen (14) days. 27 Any parties served or joined after the issuance of this scheduling order shall “make the 28 initial disclosures within 30 days after being served or joined,” as provided by Rule 1 26(a)(1)(D). 2 B. Fact Discovery 3 All fact discovery shall be completed1 no later than 7/5/2024. 4 C. Expert Discovery 5 The parties shall disclose initial experts and produce reports in accordance with 6 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) by no later than 8/2/2024. With regard to 7 expert testimony intended solely for rebuttal, those experts shall be disclosed and 8 reports produced in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) on or 9 before 8/30/2024. All expert discovery shall be completed no later than 9/27/2024. 10 Disclosures of expert witnesses, if any, must be made pursuant to Federal Rule 11 of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(A), (B) and (C), and shall include all information required 12 thereunder. Each expert witness must be fully prepared to be examined on all 13 subjects and opinions included in the disclosures. Failure to comply with these 14 requirements may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including the 15 preclusion of the expert’s testimony, or of other evidence offered through the expert. 16 D. Joint Mid-Discovery Statement 17 By 2/16/2024, all parties shall file with the Court a brief Joint Mid-Discovery 18 Statement summarizing the current status of discovery proceedings. In this statement, 19 parties should state whether parties are actively engaged in discovery and identify any 20 issues preventing discovery from proceeding in a timely manner. The filing of this 21 statement shall not relieve the parties or counsel of their obligations to meet and 22 confer, comply the deadlines set by the court, and timely notice all appropriate 23 discovery motions. 24 ///

25 1 As used herein, the word “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all 26 depositions have been taken and any disputes relevant to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been obeyed. 27 The parties are advised that motions to compel must be filed in advance of the discovery completion deadlines so that the Court may grant effective relief within the allotted discovery time. A party’s failure 28 to have a discovery dispute heard sufficiently in advance of the discovery cutoff may result in denial of 1 V. MOTIONS 2 All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining 3 orders, or other emergency applications, shall be filed on or before 12/6/2024 and 4 shall be noticed for hearing before Judge Calabretta on 1/23/2025 at 1:30 p.m. 5 Counsel are directed to refer to the local rules and Judge Calabretta’s Standing Order 6 regarding the requirements for noticing and opposing such motions on the Court’s 7 regularly scheduled law and motion calendar. 8 All moving and opposition briefs or legal memoranda in civil cases shall not 9 exceed twenty-five pages without prior leave of court. Reply briefs filed by moving 10 parties shall not exceed fifteen pages. The Court will grant an application to extend 11 these page limitations only after good cause shown. Pages that exceed the page 12 limitations without leave of court will not be considered. Finally, no supplemental 13 briefs or sur-replies shall be filed and will not be considered without prior leave of 14 court. 15 Prior to filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for partial summary 16 judgment (summary adjudication), the parties are ordered to meet and confer, in 17 person or by telephone, to discuss the issues to be raised in the motion as required by 18 Judge Calabretta’s Standing Order. Failure to do so may result in denial of the 19 motion. In addition to complying with the requirements of Local Rule 260, the 20 parties must prepare a Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts, which identifies all 21 relevant facts subject to agreement by all parties. The moving party is responsible 22 for filing the joint statement concurrently with the motion. In the notice of motion, the 23 moving party shall certify that the parties have met and conferred as ordered above or 24 provide a statement of good cause for the failure to do so.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Litwin v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/litwin-v-westchester-surplus-lines-ins-co-caed-2024.