Litwin v. Rich
This text of 8 A.D.2d 632 (Litwin v. Rich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal, as limited by appellant’s brief, is from an order denying Ms motion, made after the jury had disagreed and had been discharged, to dismiss the complaint and for a directed verdict (Civ. Prae. Act, § 457-a). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 A.D.2d 632, 185 N.Y.S.2d 758, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/litwin-v-rich-nyappdiv-1959.