Littrell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Littrell v. State

1911 OK CR 281, 117 P. 1101, 6 Okla. Crim. 179, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 361

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 23, 1911

DocketNo. A-786.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 281 (Littrell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Littrell v. State, 1911 OK CR 281, 117 P. 1101, 6 Okla. Crim. 179, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 361 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

DOYLE, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Wagoner-county for: the.crime -of-having in his *180 possession intoxicating liquors with the unlawful intent to violate the provisions of the prohibition law, and was sentenced to serve a term of 30 days in the county jail, and pay a fine of $150. The judgment and sentence was entered on February 5, 1910, from which judgment the defendant appealed by filing in this court on June 4, 1910, a petition in error with case-made. No briefs have been filed, and no counsel appeared in this court on behalf of the plaintiff in error. The Attorney General has filed a motion to affirm for want of prosecution.

We have examined the record, and no prejudicial error is apparent. The judgment as entered is somewhat irregular, but sufficient, we believe, to give this court jurisdiction on the appeal The motion to affirm is sustained, and the judgment of the lower court is- hereby affirmed. The clerk of this court will forthwith issue a mandate to the county court of Wagoner county directing said court to enforce its judgment and sentence against the plaintiff in error.

FURMAN, P. J., and ARMSTRONG, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOYLE, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Wagoner-county for: the.crime -of-having in his *180 possession intoxicating liquors with the unlawful intent to violate the provisions of the prohibition law, and was sentenced to serve a term of 30 days in the county jail, and pay a fine of $150. The judgment and sentence was entered on February 5, 1910, from which judgment the defendant appealed by filing in this court on June 4, 1910, a petition in error with case-made. No briefs have been filed, and no counsel appeared in this court on behalf of the plaintiff in error. The Attorney General has filed a motion to affirm for want of prosecution.

We have examined the record, and no prejudicial error is apparent. The judgment as entered is somewhat irregular, but sufficient, we believe, to give this court jurisdiction on the appeal The motion to affirm is sustained, and the judgment of the lower court is- hereby affirmed. The clerk of this court will forthwith issue a mandate to the county court of Wagoner county directing said court to enforce its judgment and sentence against the plaintiff in error.

FURMAN, P. J., and ARMSTRONG, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 281, 117 P. 1101, 6 Okla. Crim. 179, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/littrell-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.