Litton Systems, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

S.D. New York

Litton Systems, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

525 F. Supp. 155, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14995

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York

DecidedOctober 1, 1981

DocketNo. 77 Civ. 3720(WCC)

StatusPublished

This text of 525 F. Supp. 155 (Litton Systems, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Litton Systems, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., 525 F. Supp. 155, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14995 (S.D.N.Y. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

CONNER, District Judge:

It appearing that on June 30,1981 partial judgment was entered in this matter and in a related action, Litton Systems, Inc., et al. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., et al., 76 Civ. 2512 (WCC), the Court by that judgment retaining jurisdiction over certain matters in both cases; and that following this Court’s Orders of September 28, 1981, 525 F.Supp. 154 and October 1, 1981, 525 F.Supp. 154, no further action by this Court with regard to the above-entitled matter is required, it is

ORDERED, that this action be and hereby is transferred to the closed docket of the Court’s calendar. The Court retains jurisdiction over the counterclaims of defendants in the related action, 76 Civ. 2512 (WCC).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

CONNER, District Judge:

It appearing that on June 30,1981 partial judgment was entered in this matter and in a related action, Litton Systems, Inc., et al. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., et al., 76 Civ. 2512 (WCC), the Court by that judgment retaining jurisdiction over certain matters in both cases; and that following this Court’s Orders of September 28, 1981, 525 F.Supp. 154 and October 1, 1981, 525 F.Supp. 154, no further action by this Court with regard to the above-entitled matter is required, it is

ORDERED, that this action be and hereby is transferred to the closed docket of the Court’s calendar. The Court retains jurisdiction over the counterclaims of defendants in the related action, 76 Civ. 2512 (WCC).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

525 F. Supp. 155, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/litton-systems-inc-v-southwestern-bell-telephone-co-nysd-1981.