Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., and Anthony Louderback and Ojai Research, Inc. v. The Boeing Co., and McDonnell Douglas Corporation

Federal Circuit

Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., and Anthony Louderback and Ojai Research, Inc. v. The Boeing Co., and McDonnell Douglas Corporation

118 F.3d 746, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 16034, 1997 WL 360836

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided June 26, 1997·No. 97-1306·Published

Opinion

ORDER

RADER, Circuit Judge.

On July 13, 1996, this court entered its judgment in related Appeal Nos. 95-1242 and 95-1311 between Litton Systems, Inc. (Litton) and Honeywell, Inc. (Honeywell). On March 17, 1997, the United States Supreme Court vacated that judgment and remanded to this court for further consideration in light of Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co., — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 1040, 137 L.Ed.2d 146 (1997). By order issued today, this court has invited supplemental briefing addressing the issues raised by that vacatur and remand.

The current interlocutory appeal, Appeal No. 97-1306, relates to the district court’s order denying Litton’s motion for injunctive relief, which was issued on December 18, 1996, after this court’s judgment in the prior appeal, but before the Supreme Court’s vacatur of that judgment. In light of that vacatur, Litton seeks an order from this court staying or dismissing the current appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

(1) Litton’s Appeal No. 97-1306 is stayed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

RADER, Circuit Judge.

On July 13, 1996, this court entered its judgment in related Appeal Nos. 95-1242 and 95-1311 between Litton Systems, Inc. (Litton) and Honeywell, Inc. (Honeywell). On March 17, 1997, the United States Supreme Court vacated that judgment and remanded to this court for further consideration in light of Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co., — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 1040, 137 L.Ed.2d 146 (1997). By order issued today, this court has invited supplemental briefing addressing the issues raised by that vacatur and remand.

The current interlocutory appeal, Appeal No. 97-1306, relates to the district court’s order denying Litton’s motion for injunctive relief, which was issued on December 18, 1996, after this court’s judgment in the prior appeal, but before the Supreme Court’s vacatur of that judgment. In light of that vacatur, Litton seeks an order from this court staying or dismissing the current appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

(1) Litton’s Appeal No. 97-1306 is stayed.

Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., and Anthony Louderback and Ojai Research, Inc. v. The Boeing Co., and McDonnell Douglas Corporation, 118 F.3d 746, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 16034, 1997 WL 360836 (Fed. Cir. 1997).

Pincite

118 F.3d 746 (Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., and Anthony Louderback and Ojai Research, Inc. v. The Boeing Co., and McDonnell Douglas Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related