Littner v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

120 A.D. 874

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion, Present — Ingraham, Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Lambert, JJ., Laughlin, J., dissenting on the ground of error in charging last two requests of counsel for defendant; and Lambert, J., on the ground of error in charging second lg.st request, ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Littner v. Interurban Street Railway Co., 120 A.D. 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

120 A.D. 874 (Littner v. Interurban Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.