Littlewood v. Riley
34 N.Y.S. 1142, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 607, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 875
This text of 34 N.Y.S. 1142 (Littlewood v. Riley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Littlewood v. Riley, 34 N.Y.S. 1142, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 607, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 875 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
Opinion
The plaintiff’s case depends entirely upon his own testimony. He is contradicted by two witnesses and the written instruments. Giving to his testimony full faith, and all that it established is that the minds of the parties did not meet. At most, that would only authorize a rescission of the contract. That would not benefit the plaintiff. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 N.Y.S. 1142, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 607, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/littlewood-v-riley-nysupct-1895.