Littlepage v. Horsey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Littlepage v. Horsey

874 A.2d 1144

DecidedMay 5, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 874 A.2d 1144 (Littlepage v. Horsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Littlepage v. Horsey, 874 A.2d 1144 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal in the above captioned matter is GRANTED and ordered to be SUBMITTED, limited to the following issue:

Whether — in dismissing a prayer to set aside a Nomination Petition based on a deficiency in a timely' filed Statement of Financial Interests — the Common Pleas Court abused its discretion, committed an error of law, or must have found facts not substantially supported by the evidence.

The order below is affirmed. Opinion to follow.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal in the above captioned matter is GRANTED and ordered to be SUBMITTED, limited to the following issue:

Whether — in dismissing a prayer to set aside a Nomination Petition based on a deficiency in a timely' filed Statement of Financial Interests — the Common Pleas Court abused its discretion, committed an error of law, or must have found facts not substantially supported by the evidence.

The order below is affirmed. Opinion to follow.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

874 A.2d 1144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/littlepage-v-horsey-pa-2005.