Littlejohn v. Obama

615 F. App'x 121
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 31, 2015
DocketNo. 15-1417
StatusPublished

This text of 615 F. App'x 121 (Littlejohn v. Obama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Littlejohn v. Obama, 615 F. App'x 121 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Quintín Littlejohn appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Littlejohn v. Obama, No. 7:14-cv-00812-BHH, 2015 WL 1275346 (D.S.C. Mar. 18, 2015). We deny Littlejohn’s motions to amend the caption and to vacate the judgment of the magistrate judge. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [122]*122presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
615 F. App'x 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/littlejohn-v-obama-ca4-2015.