Littlejohn v. Gilchrist's Executors
This text of 3 N.C. 393 (Littlejohn v. Gilchrist's Executors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As to the act of 17Í5, I think it does not take place in such a case where the plaintiff claims immediately, and keeps it up by a regular correspondence and demand of payment, although seven years and more are expired after the death of the debtor before the commencement of the creditors action. As to the mode of valuing the tobacco, the general rale, no doubt is, that it shall be estimated as worth when it becomes deliverable ; but here it is proved, that at the time when the tobacco should have been delivered, it was the custom and practice of merchants to keep a tobacco account, and to give credit in tobacco, not in its value in money ; and if a balance of tobacco remained, to charge as much money as it was worth when it became payable. If the jury are satisfied of this, then they may estimate accordingly, because the custom will control the general rule of law.
Verdict and judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 N.C. 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/littlejohn-v-gilchrists-executors-ncsuperct-1806.