Littlefield v. Storey

3 Johns. 425
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1808·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a clear case. It has been decided, that this court will recognise and protect the rights of an assignee of a chose in action.

In the case of Andrews v. Beecher,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Littlefield v. Storey, 3 Johns. 425 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).

3 Johns. 425 (Littlefield v. Storey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gleason v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance
97 N.E. 35 (New York Court of Appeals, 1911)
Chamberlain v. Fernbach
118 Ill. App. 145 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1905)
Sammis v. Wightman ex rel. Marcher
31 Fla. 45 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1893)
Shriner v. Lamborn ex rel.Smith
12 Md. 170 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1858)
Winslow v. Wilkinson & Babcock
1 Minn. 362 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1857)
Whetmore v. Murdock
29 F. Cas. 922 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1847)
Fitzpatrick v. Beatty
6 Ill. 454 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1844)
Cameron v. Little
13 N.H. 23 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1842)
Ransom v. Jones ex rel. Adams
2 Ill. 291 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1836)
Farnsworth v. Sweet
5 N.H. 267 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1830)
M'Elwee v. House
17 S.C.L. 108 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1828)
Verdier v. Simons
7 S.C. Eq. 386 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1827)
Boyd v. Anderson
1 Tenn. 437 (Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity, 1809)
Boyd v. Anderson
1 Tenn. 438 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1809)