Littlefield v. Crocker
This text of 30 Me. 192 (Littlefield v. Crocker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The defendant’s title is only under the mortgage deed given to the bank, in which the demand-ant did not join.
Afterwards, her husband conveyed the equity to another person, and in this conveyance she released her right of dower. But to this conveyance the tenant is not a party or privy. Estoppels are mutual. In this case it would not be so. The defence fails. Judgment for demandant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 Me. 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/littlefield-v-crocker-me-1849.