Little v. Zelch

Missouri Court of Appeals

Little v. Zelch

507 S.W.3d 618, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1313, 2016 WL 7387594

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 20, 2016·No. No. ED 104422·Published

Opinion

[619] ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jennifer Zelch (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment in the amount of $4,923.81 for motor vehicle negligence arising out of a rear-end automobile accident with Lea Little’s (“Little”) vehicle. The trial court heard the case de novo following Appellant’s appeal from small claims court. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[619] ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jennifer Zelch (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment in the amount of $4,923.81 for motor vehicle negligence arising out of a rear-end automobile accident with Lea Little’s (“Little”) vehicle. The trial court heard the case de novo following Appellant’s appeal from small claims court. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Little v. Zelch, 507 S.W.3d 618, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1313, 2016 WL 7387594 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

507 S.W.3d 618 (Little v. Zelch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.