Little v. Wirth

26 N.Y.S. 1110
CourtThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo
DecidedDecember 29, 1893
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 26 N.Y.S. 1110 (Little v. Wirth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Little v. Wirth, 26 N.Y.S. 1110 (superctny 1893).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed from was entered in due conformity with the order sustaining the demurrer, and the notice of appeal does not ask for a review of the order. But, independently of that, the judgment .is right upon the merits, and should be affirmed upon the opinion rendered by the learned judge below. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reardon v. Shimelman
128 A. 705 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 N.Y.S. 1110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-v-wirth-superctny-1893.