Little v. Wirth
6 Misc. 301, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 295
This text of 6 Misc. 301 (Little v. Wirth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Little v. Wirth, 6 Misc. 301, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 295 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
Opinion
The judgment appealed from was entered in due conformity with the order sustaining the demurrer, and the notice of appeal does not ask for a review of the order. But independently of that the judgment is right upon the merits, [302]*302and should be affirmed upon the opinion rendered by the learned judge below.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Reardon v. Shimelman
128 A. 705 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1925)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 Misc. 301, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-v-wirth-nysuperctnyc-1893.