Little v. Wainwright

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Little v. Wainwright

287 So. 2d 124, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6145

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 28, 1973

DocketNo. 72-110

StatusPublished

This text of 287 So. 2d 124 (Little v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Little v. Wainwright, 287 So. 2d 124, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6145 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner’s original direct appeal from a judgment and sentence imposed upon conviction of breaking and entering a dwelling [125]*125house with intent to commit a felony, to-wit, grand larceny, and grand larceny was frustrated by an untimely filed notice of appeal by court appointed counsel.

We grant petitioner a belated review of the judgment and sentence equivalent to a direct appeal by means of this habeas corpus proceeding. Henninger v. State, 230 So.2d 149 (Fla.1970).

We dispense with oral argument pursuant to F.A.R. 3.10(e), 32 F.S.A. We have examined the briefs and record, and conclude that petitioner has failed to demonstrate reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is affirmed and ha-beas corpus denied.

Habeas corpus denied.

WALDEN, CROSS -and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI