Little v. United States Marshals Service
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
JOYCE LITTLE,
Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 13-379 (JEB) UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff Joyce Little filed a one-paragraph pro se Complaint in D.C. Superior Court on
February 28, 2013. She alleged that the United States Marshals Service broke the zipper on her
coat when she entered the courthouse. See ECF No. 1 (Notice of Removal), Attach. 1
(Complaint). After USMS removed the case to this Court, it filed a Motion to Dismiss. See ECF
No. 4. On April 1, 2013, the Court issued an Order directing Plaintiff to respond to the Motion
by April 15 or risk the Court’s deeming the matter conceded. See ECF No. 5. As Plaintiff has
not done so, the Court will treat the Motion as conceded and dismiss the case without prejudice.
See LCvR 7(b). A contemporaneous Order will so state.
/s/ James E. Boasberg JAMES E. BOASBERG United States District Judge Date: April 22, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Little v. United States Marshals Service (Little v. United States Marshals Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.