Little v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Little v. State

220 S.W.2d 469, 153 Tex. Crim. 409, 1949 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1203

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 13, 1949·No. No. 24340·Published

Opinions

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $500 and imprisonment in the county jail for 35 days.

The statement of facts appears incorporated in the trans-script. By the express provisions of Art. 760, C. C. P., as amended, we are precluded from considering such a statement of facts. See: Beevers v. State, 209 S. W. (2d) 175; Reece v. State, 209 S. W. (2d) 177.

The complaint and information charge the offense for which appellant stands convicted.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $500 and imprisonment in the county jail for 35 days.

The statement of facts appears incorporated in the trans-script. By the express provisions of Art. 760, C. C. P., as amended, we are precluded from considering such a statement of facts. See: Beevers v. State, 209 S. W. (2d) 175; Reece v. State, 209 S. W. (2d) 177.

The complaint and information charge the offense for which appellant stands convicted.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Little v. State, 220 S.W.2d 469, 153 Tex. Crim. 409, 1949 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1203 (Tex. 1949).

Pincite

220 S.W.2d 469 (Little v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related