Little v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Little v. State

1918 OK CR 168, 175 P. 945, 15 Okla. Crim. 221, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 56

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 23, 1918

DocketNo. 3087.

StatusPublished

This text of 1918 OK CR 168 (Little v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Little v. State, 1918 OK CR 168, 175 P. 945, 15 Okla. Crim. 221, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 56 (Okla. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Pete Little, was convicted in the county court of Carter county on a charge that he did unlawfully transport six sacks of beer and one sack of whisky from a point near Dundee, Carter county, to a point one mile and a half southwest of Dundee, and his punishment was fixed at 30 days’ imprisonment and a fine of $50. From the judgment rendered on the verdict, he appealed by filing in this court, on July 27th, a petition in error with case-made.

No brief has been filed nor oral argument made. For this reason the Attorney General has filed a motion to affirm the judgment. An examination of the record discloses that the appeal is without merit.

The judgment is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Pete Little, was convicted in the county court of Carter county on a charge that he did unlawfully transport six sacks of beer and one sack of whisky from a point near Dundee, Carter county, to a point one mile and a half southwest of Dundee, and his punishment was fixed at 30 days’ imprisonment and a fine of $50. From the judgment rendered on the verdict, he appealed by filing in this court, on July 27th, a petition in error with case-made.

No brief has been filed nor oral argument made. For this reason the Attorney General has filed a motion to affirm the judgment. An examination of the record discloses that the appeal is without merit.

The judgment is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1918 OK CR 168, 175 P. 945, 15 Okla. Crim. 221, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-v-state-oklacrimapp-1918.