Little v. State
211 S.E.2d 197, 133 Ga. App. 304, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1048
Opinion
The defendant was tried and convicted of theft by [305] conversion. An appeal was filed and the case is here for review. Held:
1. The defendant contends that it was error to admit certain business records in evidence. The evidence in regard to the records was sufficient to meet the requirements of Code Ann. § 38-711 (Ga. L. 1952, p. 177) and their admission was not error.
2. The remaining enumerations of error are without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Little v. State, 211 S.E.2d 197, 133 Ga. App. 304, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1048 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974).
211 S.E.2d 197 (Little v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Zipperer v. State
293 S.E.2d 44 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)