Little v. State

211 S.E.2d 197, 133 Ga. App. 304, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1048
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 8, 1974·No. 49685·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Quillian, Judge.

The defendant was tried and convicted of theft by [305] conversion. An appeal was filed and the case is here for review. Held:

Submitted October 7, 1974 Decided November 8, 1974. John R. Nicholson, Sandy McCormack, for appellant.

1. The defendant contends that it was error to admit certain business records in evidence. The evidence in regard to the records was sufficient to meet the requirements of Code Ann. § 38-711 (Ga. L. 1952, p. 177) and their admission was not error.

2. The remaining enumerations of error are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Clark, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Little v. State, 211 S.E.2d 197, 133 Ga. App. 304, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1048 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974).

211 S.E.2d 197 (Little v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zipperer v. State
293 S.E.2d 44 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)