Little v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Little v. State

194 S.E. 878, 57 Ga. App. 198, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 527

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 7, 1938·No. 26629·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of possessing whisky. The evidence for the State amply authorized the verdict. The defendant introduced no evidence; and his unsworn statement was evidently rejected by the judge, sitting without the intervention of a jury. No motion for new trial was filed. The judge did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of possessing whisky. The evidence for the State amply authorized the verdict. The defendant introduced no evidence; and his unsworn statement was evidently rejected by the judge, sitting without the intervention of a jury. No motion for new trial was filed. The judge did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Little v. State, 194 S.E. 878, 57 Ga. App. 198, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 527 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

194 S.E. 878 (Little v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.