Little v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Little v. State

194 S.E. 878, 57 Ga. App. 198, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 527

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 7, 1938

Docket26629

StatusPublished

This text of 194 S.E. 878 (Little v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Little v. State, 194 S.E. 878, 57 Ga. App. 198, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 527 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of possessing whisky. The evidence for the State amply authorized the verdict. The defendant introduced no evidence; and his unsworn statement was evidently rejected by the judge, sitting without the intervention of a jury. No motion for new trial was filed. The judge did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of possessing whisky. The evidence for the State amply authorized the verdict. The defendant introduced no evidence; and his unsworn statement was evidently rejected by the judge, sitting without the intervention of a jury. No motion for new trial was filed. The judge did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 S.E. 878, 57 Ga. App. 198, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-v-state-gactapp-1938.