Little v. State

632 So. 2d 689, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1468, 1994 WL 58224
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 25, 1994
DocketNo. 92-02567
StatusPublished

This text of 632 So. 2d 689 (Little v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Little v. State, 632 So. 2d 689, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1468, 1994 WL 58224 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Appellant, David Wayne Little, challenges his convictions and sentences for second degree murder and driving under the influence. He was sentenced to twenty years in prison followed by five years probation for murder and twelve months probation concurrent to the other probation for the DUI. As a condition of his probation, appellant was ordered to pay $5,742 in restitution to the victim’s mother, which was the total amount requested.

Appellant first argues his conviction should be reversed because the state was improperly allowed to impeach its own witness with a prior inconsistent statement. Any possible error in this regard was harmless because we find beyond a reasonable doubt that the verdict was not affected by any such error. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

Appellant next argues that the amount of restitution awarded is improper. Appellant objects to awarding $500 in air fare to the victim’s brother to attend the trial when the brother was not a witness at the [690]*690trial. We agree that this expense was too remote to justify reimbursement. Ahnen v. State, 666 So.2d 855 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Watson v. State, 579 So.2d 900 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Cliburn v. State, 510 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

We affirm appellant’s convictions and reverse his sentences only to the extent that on remand the amount of $500 should be stricken from the award of restitution.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and HALL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Thomas
666 So. 2d 855 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1995)
State v. DiGuilio
491 So. 2d 1129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Watson v. State
579 So. 2d 900 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Cliburn v. State
510 So. 2d 1155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
632 So. 2d 689, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1468, 1994 WL 58224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.