Little v. Sparks

37 S.E. 364, 112 Ga. 220, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 102
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 26, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 37 S.E. 364 (Little v. Sparks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Little v. Sparks, 37 S.E. 364, 112 Ga. 220, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 102 (Ga. 1900).

Opinion

By the Court.

When a trial judge refused to certify a bill of exceptions on the ground, among others, that it embraced matter which in his opinion was unnecessary and irrelevant, and when, on the hearing in this court of a mandamus sued out with a view to obtaining an order compelling the judge to certify such bill of exceptions, it appears that the matter in question was of the nature above indicated, the mandamus will not be made absolute.

Mandamus absolute denied.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ryals v. Hardeman
188 S.E. 444 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Brown v. Hutcheson
146 S.E. 329 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Planters & Peoples Mutual Fire Ass'n v. DeLoach
39 S.E. 466 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 S.E. 364, 112 Ga. 220, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-v-sparks-ga-1900.