Little v. Sparks
37 S.E. 364, 112 Ga. 220, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 102
Opinion
When a trial judge refused to certify a bill of exceptions on the ground, among others, that it embraced matter which in his opinion was unnecessary and irrelevant, and when, on the hearing in this court of a mandamus sued out with a view to obtaining an order compelling the judge to certify such bill of exceptions, it appears that the matter in question was of the nature above indicated, the mandamus will not be made absolute.
Mandamus absolute denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Little v. Sparks, 37 S.E. 364, 112 Ga. 220, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 102 (Ga. 1900).
37 S.E. 364 (Little v. Sparks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ryals v. Hardeman
188 S.E. 444 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Brown v. Hutcheson
146 S.E. 329 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Planters & Peoples Mutual Fire Ass'n v. DeLoach
39 S.E. 466 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)