Little v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Little v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

212 S.E.2d 674, 25 N.C. App. 304, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2495

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedApril 2, 1975

DocketNo. 7421SC1071

StatusPublished

This text of 212 S.E.2d 674 (Little v. North Carolina State Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Little v. North Carolina State Board of Elections, 212 S.E.2d 674, 25 N.C. App. 304, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2495 (N.C. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PARKER, Judge.

If the legal questions on which petitioner seeks the decision of this Court were decided for him and the judgment appealed from reversed, it could avail him nothing. The only relief which he sought was that a new primary election be held to select the Democratic Party nominee to run for the office of Alderman from the North Ward in Winston-Salem in the general election held in November 1974. That general election has been held, and it is not now possible to give petitioner the relief which he sought. There is slight probability that the factual situation which gave rise to this controversy will recur, and the legal questions on which decision is sought lack substantial continuing public interest. The legal questions presented are academic. For that reason the appeal is dismissed. Gordon v. Wallace and Gordon v. Page, 233 N.C. 85, 62 S.E. 2d 495 (1950).

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Hedrick and Clark concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PARKER, Judge.

If the legal questions on which petitioner seeks the decision of this Court were decided for him and the judgment appealed from reversed, it could avail him nothing. The only relief which he sought was that a new primary election be held to select the Democratic Party nominee to run for the office of Alderman from the North Ward in Winston-Salem in the general election held in November 1974. That general election has been held, and it is not now possible to give petitioner the relief which he sought. There is slight probability that the factual situation which gave rise to this controversy will recur, and the legal questions on which decision is sought lack substantial continuing public interest. The legal questions presented are academic. For that reason the appeal is dismissed. Gordon v. Wallace and Gordon v. Page, 233 N.C. 85, 62 S.E. 2d 495 (1950).

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Hedrick and Clark concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 S.E.2d 674, 25 N.C. App. 304, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-v-north-carolina-state-board-of-elections-ncctapp-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack