Little v. Moore

239 S.W.2d 238, 1951 Ky. LEXIS 867
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedMay 1, 1951
StatusPublished

This text of 239 S.W.2d 238 (Little v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Little v. Moore, 239 S.W.2d 238, 1951 Ky. LEXIS 867 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

CULLEN, Commissioner.

The respondent, the attorneys, the factual situation, and the relief sought, in this case, are the same as those in Bentley v. Moore, Ky., 239 S.W.2d 237.

It appearing, for the reasons stated in the Bentley case, that the petitioner in this case has an adequate remedy by appeal, his motion for a writ of prohibition is overruled and his petition is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bentley v. Moore
239 S.W.2d 237 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 S.W.2d 238, 1951 Ky. LEXIS 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-v-moore-kyctapp-1951.