Little v. Mitchell

604 P.2d 918, 1979 Utah LEXIS 966
CourtUtah Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 11, 1979
Docket16678
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 604 P.2d 918 (Little v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Little v. Mitchell, 604 P.2d 918, 1979 Utah LEXIS 966 (Utah 1979).

Opinion

WILKINS, Justice:

Plaintiffs brought this action against the State Division of Family Services and the individual defendants alleging negligence in connection with placement, supervision and foster care given by them. The defendants asserted the defense of sovereign immunity and moved to dismiss the action on that *919 ground. The court denied their motion. Defendants then proceeded under Rule 54(b), U.R.C.P. to have the trial court sign an order that the ruling was a final judgment and appealed that ruling to this Court. This Court entered its order dismissing the appeal. Within the 20 days allowed for doing so, the defendants filed a petition for rehearing.

The significant part of Rule 54(b) provides that when multiple claims and/or parties are involved, “. . . the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties . . [when] . there is no just reason for delay . ..” This does not necessarily mean that there is a final judgment merely because the order so recites. In this instance, the trial court denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss, thus leaving the parties in court, and there was, therefore, in fact no final judgment. 1 The previously entered order of this Court granting the motion to dismiss the appeal is reaffirmed.

CROCKETT, C. J., and MAUGHAN, HALL and STEWART, JJ., concur.
1

. It is to be noted that a party is not left without remedy. If there are good and sufficient reasons for such an appeal before further proceedings and determination of the issues in the lawsuits, a party may petition the Supreme Court for an intermediate appeal as provided in Rule 72(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R.H.D. v. S.F.
967 P.2d 947 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1998)
Matter of Adoption of Baby K.
967 P.2d 947 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1998)
Bennion v. Pennzoil Co.
826 P.2d 137 (Utah Supreme Court, 1992)
Kennecott Corp. v. Utah State Tax Commission
814 P.2d 1099 (Utah Supreme Court, 1991)
Planning Board v. Mortimer
530 A.2d 1237 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1987)
Olson v. Salt Lake City School District
724 P.2d 960 (Utah Supreme Court, 1986)
Pate v. Marathon Steel Co.
692 P.2d 765 (Utah Supreme Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
604 P.2d 918, 1979 Utah LEXIS 966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-v-mitchell-utah-1979.