Little v. Holman
This text of Little v. Holman (Little v. Holman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:22-cv-00230 Paul La’Mark Little, Plaintiff, v. Christopher A. Holman et al., Defendants.
ORDER Plaintiff Paul La’Mark Little, a prisoner confined within the Texas prison system proceeding pro se and 7” forma pauperis, filed this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love. On January 18, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (Doc. 10) be denied. Doc. 25. A copy of that report was sent to plaintiff at his last-known address. The docket reflects that plaintiff received a copy of the report on January 24, 2023. Doc. 28. No objections were filed. When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 10) is denied. So ordered by the court on February 24, 2023.
CAMPBELL BARKER United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Little v. Holman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-v-holman-txed-2023.