Little v. Estes

Fourth Circuit

Little v. Estes

606 F. App'x 112

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 22, 2015·No. No. 15-1206·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Little appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint as barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Little v. Estes, No. l:13-cv-01514-WDQ, 2015 WL 794500 (D.Md. Feb. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Little appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint as barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Little v. Estes, No. l:13-cv-01514-WDQ, 2015 WL 794500 (D.Md. Feb. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Little v. Estes, 606 F. App'x 112 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

606 F. App'x 112 (Little v. Estes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.