Little v. El Dorado Creosoting Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Little v. El Dorado Creosoting Co.

71 So. 2d 621

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 24, 1954

DocketNo. 8122

StatusPublished

This text of 71 So. 2d 621 (Little v. El Dorado Creosoting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Little v. El Dorado Creosoting Co., 71 So. 2d 621 (La. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

GLADNEY, Judge.

The issues of both fact and law presented in this case are not different from those presented in Johnson v. El Dorado Creosoting Company and Coal Operators Casualty Company, La.App., 71 So.2d 613. Our findings therein are decisive in the instant case.

[622]*622The judgment from which appealed is reversed and set aside insofar as it overruled the exception to the jurisdiction ratione personae filed by the El Dorado Creosoting Company, Inc., and it is ordered that said exception be sustained as to the above named defendant, and plaintiff’s suit be and is hereby dismissed as of non-suit at plaintiff’s cost. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed at plaintiff’s costs.

AYRES, J., is recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GLADNEY, Judge.

The issues of both fact and law presented in this case are not different from those presented in Johnson v. El Dorado Creosoting Company and Coal Operators Casualty Company, La.App., 71 So.2d 613. Our findings therein are decisive in the instant case.

[622]*622The judgment from which appealed is reversed and set aside insofar as it overruled the exception to the jurisdiction ratione personae filed by the El Dorado Creosoting Company, Inc., and it is ordered that said exception be sustained as to the above named defendant, and plaintiff’s suit be and is hereby dismissed as of non-suit at plaintiff’s cost. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed at plaintiff’s costs.

AYRES, J., is recused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 So. 2d 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-v-el-dorado-creosoting-co-lactapp-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack