Little v. Department of Labor & Employment Security

652 So. 2d 927, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3218, 1995 WL 133357
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 29, 1995·No. No. 94-213·Published

Opinion

ALLEN, Judge.

The appellant challenges an order of the Public Employees Relations Commission (PERC) which determined that the appellant had abandoned her position with the appellee Department of Labor and Employment Security. We reject the appellant’s assertions that the evidence establishes as a matter of law that no abandonment took place and that the hearing officer erred in rejecting testimony from the appellant’s supervisor. But we find merit in the appellant’s contention that the hearing officer and PERC erred in relying upon the evidentiary presumption of abandonment found in Florida Administrative Code Rule 22A-7.010(2)(a),

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Little v. Department of Labor & Employment Security, 652 So. 2d 927, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3218, 1995 WL 133357 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

652 So. 2d 927 (Little v. Department of Labor & Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDonald v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION
582 So. 2d 660 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Jenkins v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERVICES
618 So. 2d 749 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Tomlinson v. DHRS
558 So. 2d 62 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)