Little v. Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Little v. Department of Corrections

199 F. App'x 260

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 7, 2006·No. No. 06-6640·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Eugene Little appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Little v. Dep’t of Corr., No. 5:06-cv-00035, 2006 WL 839082 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 24, 2006). We deny Little’s motion for appointment of counsel and his motion for this court to intervene in his grievance with the prison. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Eugene Little appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Little v. Dep’t of Corr., No. 5:06-cv-00035, 2006 WL 839082 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 24, 2006). We deny Little’s motion for appointment of counsel and his motion for this court to intervene in his grievance with the prison. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Little v. Department of Corrections, 199 F. App'x 260 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

199 F. App'x 260 (Little v. Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related