Little v. City of Bessemer

35 So. 64, 138 Ala. 127
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 15, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 35 So. 64 (Little v. City of Bessemer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Little v. City of Bessemer, 35 So. 64, 138 Ala. 127 (Ala. 1902).

Opinion

DOWDELL, J.

The right to public office cannot be tested by injunction on a bill in equity. The remedy is by quo warranto. — Beebe v. Robinson, 52 Ala. 66; Moulton v. Reid, 54 Ala. 323; T-Iigh on Injunctions, (3d ed.), § 1312. The court erred in overruling the motion to dismiss the bill and dissolve the injunction. The decree of the court will be reversed and a decree will he here rendered dissolving the injunction and dismiss-ins the bill.

[129]*129This cause was submitted together with the case of E. A. Little et al. v. T. T. Huey, et al, ex rel. The State, which latter (‘ase is a proceeding by quo toarranto, and in which the questions sought to be presented for review by the present case are. considered and determined. — E. A. Little et al v. Huey, et al. 137 Ala. 640.

Reversed and rendered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coulter v. Reese
75 So. 2d 608 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1954)
Hodges v. Board of Education of Geneva County
16 So. 2d 97 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1943)
Allen v. State ex rel. Rowe
61 So. 912 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 So. 64, 138 Ala. 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-v-city-of-bessemer-ala-1902.