Little v. City of Bessemer

138 Ala. 127
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1902·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

DOWDELL, J.

The right to public office cannot be tested by injunction on a bill in equity. The remedy is by quo warranto. — Beebe v. Robinson, 52 Ala. 66; Moulton v. Reid, 54 Ala. 323; T-Iigh on Injunctions, (3d ed.), § 1312. The court erred in overruling the motion to dismiss the bill and dissolve the injunction. The decree of the court will be reversed and a decree will he here rendered dissolving the injunction and dismiss-ins the bill.

[129] This cause was submitted together with the case of E. A. Little et al. v. T. T. Huey, et al, ex rel. The State, which latter (‘ase is a proceeding by quo toarranto, and in which the questions sought to be presented for review by the present case are. considered and determined. — E. A. Little et al v. Huey, et al. 137 Ala. 640.

Reversed and rendered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Little v. City of Bessemer, 138 Ala. 127 (Ala. 1902).

138 Ala. 127 (Little v. City of Bessemer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coulter v. Reese
75 So. 2d 608 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1954)
Hodges v. Board of Education of Geneva County
16 So. 2d 97 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1943)
Allen v. State ex rel. Rowe
61 So. 912 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1913)