Little v. City of Bessemer
This text of 35 So. 64 (Little v. City of Bessemer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The right to public office cannot be tested by injunction on a bill in equity. The remedy is by quo warranto. — Beebe v. Robinson, 52 Ala. 66; Moulton v. Reid, 54 Ala. 323; T-Iigh on Injunctions, (3d ed.), § 1312. The court erred in overruling the motion to dismiss the bill and dissolve the injunction. The decree of the court will be reversed and a decree will he here rendered dissolving the injunction and dismiss-ins the bill.
[129]*129This cause was submitted together with the case of E. A. Little et al. v. T. T. Huey, et al, ex rel. The State, which latter (‘ase is a proceeding by quo toarranto, and in which the questions sought to be presented for review by the present case are. considered and determined. — E. A. Little et al v. Huey, et al. 137 Ala. 640.
Reversed and rendered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 So. 64, 138 Ala. 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-v-city-of-bessemer-ala-1902.