Home/Idaho Supreme Court/Little v. Burlingham

Little v. Burlingham

198 P. 465, 33 Idaho 760, 1921 Ida. LEXIS 56
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Little v. Burlingham. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 Idaho 757 →
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided May 17, 1921·Published

Opinion

BUDGE, J.

The questions presented upon this appeal are identical with those in the ease of Little v. Burlingham, ante, p. 757, 198 Pac. 464. Upon the authority of that ease, the judgment in this case' is affirmed. Costs are awarded to respondents.

Rice, C. J., and Dunn and Lee, JJ., concur. McCarthy, J., did not sit at the hearing and took no part in this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Little v. Burlingham, 198 P. 465, 33 Idaho 760, 1921 Ida. LEXIS 56 (Idaho 1921).

198 P. 465 (Little v. Burlingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Little v. Burlingham
198 P. 464 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1921)