Little v. . Buie

58 N.C. 10
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 5, 1859·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*11 MáNly, J.

It is clear, upon the authority of the case of McMichal v. Moore, 3 Jones’ Eq. Rep. 471, that the father, upon the death of his son, took his entire interest in the land, in question, and the half sisters, not being of the blood of the transmitting ancestor took nothing. In making, therefore, the sisters parties complainant, there has been a misjoinder, for which defendants may demur. (See Story’s Eq. Pl. S. 544, and the cases there cited.)

The order below is affirmed, the demurrer is sustained, and the bill dismissed without prejudice, but at the plaintiffs’ costs.

Pee, Cueiam, ■ Decree accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Little v. . Buie, 58 N.C. 10 (N.C. 1859).

58 N.C. 10 (Little v. . Buie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Noble v. . Williams
83 S.E. 180 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1914)
Paul v. . Carter
68 S.E. 905 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)