Little v. Brown

Missouri Court of Appeals

Little v. Brown

518 S.W.3d 858, 2017 WL 1485563, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 326

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 25, 2017·No. NO. ED 103368·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Anthony Brown appeals the trial court’s judgment upon jury verdicts in favor of his divorce lawyer, Karen Little, after Little filed a suit on account to recover her fees and Brown countersued for malpractice. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Anthony Brown appeals the trial court’s judgment upon jury verdicts in favor of his divorce lawyer, Karen Little, after Little filed a suit on account to recover her fees and Brown countersued for malpractice. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Little v. Brown, 518 S.W.3d 858, 2017 WL 1485563, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 326 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

518 S.W.3d 858 (Little v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.