Little v. Brown

518 S.W.3d 858, 2017 WL 1485563, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 326
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 25, 2017
DocketNO. ED 103368
StatusPublished

This text of 518 S.W.3d 858 (Little v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Little v. Brown, 518 S.W.3d 858, 2017 WL 1485563, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 326 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Anthony Brown appeals the trial court’s judgment upon jury verdicts in favor of his divorce lawyer, Karen Little, after Little filed a suit on account to recover her fees and Brown countersued for malpractice. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
518 S.W.3d 858, 2017 WL 1485563, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-v-brown-moctapp-2017.