Little v. Breed

133 S.E. 104, 162 Ga. 301, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 168
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 15, 1926
DocketNo. 5217
StatusPublished

This text of 133 S.E. 104 (Little v. Breed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Little v. Breed, 133 S.E. 104, 162 Ga. 301, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 168 (Ga. 1926).

Opinion

Hill, J.

The assignments of error on questions of law are without merit. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. J. T. Thomasson, for plaintiff in error. M. U. Mooty, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 S.E. 104, 162 Ga. 301, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-v-breed-ga-1926.