Little v. Breed

133 S.E. 104, 162 Ga. 301, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 168
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 15, 1926·No. No. 5217·Published

Opinion

Hill, J.

The assignments of error on questions of law are without merit. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. J. T. Thomasson, for plaintiff in error. M. U. Mooty, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Little v. Breed, 133 S.E. 104, 162 Ga. 301, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 168 (Ga. 1926).

133 S.E. 104 (Little v. Breed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.