Little v. Bigelow

New York Supreme Court

Little v. Bigelow

2 How. Pr. 164

DecidedJune 15, 1846

StatusPublished

This text of 2 How. Pr. 164 (Little v. Bigelow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Little v. Bigelow, 2 How. Pr. 164 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).

Pincite

Opinion

It was objected by defendant’s counsel that the affidavit for the motion did not come within the rule; it should have been made by the party, or a .sufficient excuse shown.

Jewett, Justice.

The affidavit on which the motion is [165]*165founded is made by the law-partner of plaintiff’s attorney; it should have been made by the plaintiff, no sufficient excuse is shown why it was not so made.' Motion denied with $7 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It was objected by defendant’s counsel that the affidavit for the motion did not come within the rule; it should have been made by the party, or a .sufficient excuse shown.

Jewett, Justice.

The affidavit on which the motion is [165]*165founded is made by the law-partner of plaintiff’s attorney; it should have been made by the plaintiff, no sufficient excuse is shown why it was not so made.' Motion denied with $7 costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 How. Pr. 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-v-bigelow-nysupct-1846.