Little v. Barksdale

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Little v. Barksdale

63 S.E. 308, 81 S.C. 392, 1908 S.C. LEXIS 301

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedOctober 17, 1908

Docket7032

StatusPublished

This text of 63 S.E. 308 (Little v. Barksdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Little v. Barksdale, 63 S.E. 308, 81 S.C. 392, 1908 S.C. LEXIS 301 (S.C. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After hearing the petition for injunction, and affidavits in support thereof, the Court is of opinion that the petitioners have a plain and adequate remedy at law and that no property rights are involved justifying the interference of this Court with the election by injunction.

It is, therefore, ordered that the demurrer be sustained and the petition dismissed.

Mr. Justice Gary did not sit in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

After hearing the petition for injunction, and affidavits in support thereof, the Court is of opinion that the petitioners have a plain and adequate remedy at law and that no property rights are involved justifying the interference of this Court with the election by injunction.

It is, therefore, ordered that the demurrer be sustained and the petition dismissed.

Mr. Justice Gary did not sit in this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 S.E. 308, 81 S.C. 392, 1908 S.C. LEXIS 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-v-barksdale-sc-1908.