Little v. Barksdale

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Little v. Barksdale

63 S.E. 308, 81 S.C. 392, 1908 S.C. LEXIS 301

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided October 17, 1908·No. 7032·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After hearing the petition for injunction, and affidavits in support thereof, the Court is of opinion that the petitioners have a plain and adequate remedy at law and that no property rights are involved justifying the interference of this Court with the election by injunction.

It is, therefore, ordered that the demurrer be sustained and the petition dismissed.

Mr. Justice Gary did not sit in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

After hearing the petition for injunction, and affidavits in support thereof, the Court is of opinion that the petitioners have a plain and adequate remedy at law and that no property rights are involved justifying the interference of this Court with the election by injunction.

It is, therefore, ordered that the demurrer be sustained and the petition dismissed.

Mr. Justice Gary did not sit in this case.

Little v. Barksdale, 63 S.E. 308, 81 S.C. 392, 1908 S.C. LEXIS 301 (S.C. 1908).

Pincite

63 S.E. 308 (Little v. Barksdale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.