Little Tarkio Drainage District No. One v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

139 S.W. 587, 237 Mo. 102, 1911 Mo. LEXIS 232
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided July 15, 1911·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WOODSON, J.

This is another appeal growing out of the case of In re Drainage District v. Richardson, just decided, and reported in 237 Mo. 49.

All the questions presented by this appeal are decided either in the Richardson case, or in the case No. 16383, between these same parties, just decided, and reported at 237 Mo. 86.’

For the reasons stated in those cases, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

All concur, except Kennish,-J., who dissents, and Graves, J.; who expresses no opinion. -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Little Tarkio Drainage District No. One v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad, 139 S.W. 587, 237 Mo. 102, 1911 Mo. LEXIS 232 (Mo. 1911).

139 S.W. 587 (Little Tarkio Drainage District No. One v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mitcham v. State
332 S.W.2d 714 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)