Little Tarkio Drainage District No. One v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Little Tarkio Drainage District No. One v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

139 S.W. 587, 237 Mo. 102, 1911 Mo. LEXIS 232

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedJuly 15, 1911

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 139 S.W. 587 (Little Tarkio Drainage District No. One v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Little Tarkio Drainage District No. One v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad, 139 S.W. 587, 237 Mo. 102, 1911 Mo. LEXIS 232 (Mo. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

WOODSON, J.

This is another appeal growing out of the case of In re Drainage District v. Richardson, just decided, and reported in 237 Mo. 49.

All the questions presented by this appeal are decided either in the Richardson case, or in the case No. 16383, between these same parties, just decided, and reported at 237 Mo. 86.’

For the reasons stated in those cases, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

All concur, except Kennish,-J., who dissents, and Graves, J.; who expresses no opinion. -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI