Little Schuylkill Navigation Railroad & Coal Co. v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.

69 Pa. Super. 122, 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 27
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 2, 1918
DocketAppeal, No. 229
StatusPublished

This text of 69 Pa. Super. 122 (Little Schuylkill Navigation Railroad & Coal Co. v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Little Schuylkill Navigation Railroad & Coal Co. v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co., 69 Pa. Super. 122, 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 27 (Pa. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

It is conceded by the appellant that there is no distinction in principle between the case under consideration and that of Catawissa R. R. Company against the present appellant, reported in 255 Pa. 269, and the appellant urges that decision was erroneous.

Under the act of assembly creating the Superior Court it is provided, section 10, “Upon any question whatever before the said court the decision of the Supreme Court shall be received and followed as a binding authority.” Por this reason we adopt the conclusion reached by the Supreme Court and affirm this judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Catawissa Railroad v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.
99 A. 807 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 Pa. Super. 122, 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-schuylkill-navigation-railroad-coal-co-v-philadelphia-reading-pasuperct-1918.