Little Rock School v. Pulaski Cty School
This text of Little Rock School v. Pulaski Cty School (Little Rock School v. Pulaski Cty School) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION
LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. PLAINTIFFS
No. 4:82-cv-866-DPM
PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, JACKSONVILLE/NORTH PULASKI SCHOOL DISTRICT, e¢ al. DEFENDANTS
EMILY McCLENDON, TAMARA EACKLES, VALERIE STALLINGS, TIFFANY ELLIS, and LINDA MORGAN INTERVENORS
ORDER The Ellis Intervenors move unopposed for the Court to approve their recent settlement on monitoring and attorney’s fees for JNPSD- related work since 2018. Doc. 5740. The Court appreciates the exhibits with the Intervenors’ billing records; and the Court commends the parties for negotiating and compromising on this fee issue. The Court regrets its tardiness in tending to it. Some of the proposed hourly rates are too high for this work in this market. But on the whole, the $130,000 deal is fair and reasonable for all the good work done. Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, 921 F.2d 1371, 1383 (8th Cir. 1990). The unopposed motion, Doc. 5740, is therefore granted.
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge JA4 Tanvory AA
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Little Rock School v. Pulaski Cty School, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-rock-school-v-pulaski-cty-school-ared-2022.