Little Rock, Mississippi River & Texas Ry. v. Manees
This text of 44 Ark. 100 (Little Rock, Mississippi River & Texas Ry. v. Manees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action for $125, for the value of a horse alleged to have been killed by the appellant’s train. The action was begun before a justice of the peace. The plaintiff recovered $125. The defendant appealed to the Circuit Court, where a judgment was rendered against it in the sum of $100, and this 'appeal taken.
By section 40, of article 7, Constitution of 1874, the jurisdiction of justices of the peace in all matters of damage to personal property is expressly limited to cases where the amount in controversy does not exceed $100.
In actions sounding in damages, the damages that are claimed by the plaintiff furnish the criterion of jurisdiction. Murphy v. Howard, Hempst., 205; Lafferty v. Day, 7 Ark., 258; State v. Scoggin, 10 Ib., 326; Culver v. Crawford County, 4 Dillon, 239; Lee v. Watson, 1 Wallace, 337; Burr v. Bayne, 10 Watts, 299; Howell v. Milligan, 13 Ark., 40.
It follows that the justice of the peace had no jurisdiction of the plaintiff’s demand, and the Circuit Court acquired none by-appeal. Latham v. Jones, 6 Ark., 371; Pendleton v. Fowler, Ib., 41; Levy v. Shurman, Ib., 182; Collins v. Woodruff, 9 Ib., 463.
The judgment below is vacated, and the cause is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 Ark. 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-rock-mississippi-river-texas-ry-v-manees-ark-1884.