Little Rock & Fort Smith R. R. v. Howell

31 Ark. 119
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 15, 1876
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 31 Ark. 119 (Little Rock & Fort Smith R. R. v. Howell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Little Rock & Fort Smith R. R. v. Howell, 31 Ark. 119 (Ark. 1876).

Opinion

Harrison, J.:

The plaintiff, George "W. Howell, resided on and cultivated, ©n the 1st day of November, 1858, and until the commencement of this suit, the north fractional part and the. south fractional part of the southwest quarter' of section six, in township five, north of range fifteen west, containing 126.54 acres in Conway county, part of that portion of the lands granted by Congress to the State of Arkansas to aid in the construction of the Cairo and Fulton Railroad and its branches, transferred and granted by the State to the Little Rock and Fort Smith Railroad Company in aid of the construction of its road, and having filed in the Auditor’s office the requisite proof of such residence and • cultivation, after the title of the company had become indefeasible, and it could sell and dispose of the lands, he applied to purchase the tract, offering the price, two dollars and fifty cents per acre, fixed by the Legislature.

The company refusing to sell to him at that price, he brought this suit against it to compel the sale.

Upon demurrer to the complaint, the sale of the tract, at the price so fixed and offered by the plaintiff, was decreed by the court, and the defendant appealed.

The lands along the Fort Smith branch of the Cairo and Fulton Railroad weré first granted by the General Assembly, by the act of January 19th, 1855, entitled, “An act fixing the line of the Little Rock and Fort Smith branch of the Cairo and Fulton Railroad, and granting the lands donated.by Congress to the State in aid thereof,” to a company of the same name as that of the- defendant, that had been formed under the general incorporation act of 1851, which failed to accept the grant and comply with its conditions. ,

The grant to the defendant was by the act of .November 26th, 1856, entitled, “An act to amend an act to aid in the construction of the Cairo and Fulton Railroad,” approved January 16th, 1855, the first section of which is as.follows:

“ Section 1. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas, That all the lands granted, or intended to be granted, to the State of Arkansas by virtue of the provisions of the act of Congress aforesaid, approved February ■ 9th, 1853, ■which lie along and adjacent to the route of the said Cairo- and Fulton Railroad, from the south boundary of Missouri to the boundary line of Texas, as surveyed, located and established by said company, and approved and confirmed by the act of the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas aforesaid, approved January 16th, 1855, and re-affirmed and established by this act, including all such lands as have been or shall be selected under and by virtue of the provisions contained in said act of Congress, in lieu of such lands as have been sold or may have been otherwise appropriated by the United States, with all the rights conferred by said act of Congress, be and the same are hereby granted, conveyed and confirmed unto the said Cairo and Fulton Railroad Company, as organized under and by virtue of the provisions of the act aforesaid of January 12th 1853, (which act is referred to in the preamble) subject to all the conditions, limitations and restrictions contained in the act of Congress aforesaid, and in the act of Congress entitled, ‘ An act for the relief of settlers on lands reserved for railroad purposes/ approved March 27th, 1854; Provided, That all costs and charges incident to the selection, listing, control and sale of said lands shall be paid by said company, and no part thereof by said State of Arkansas; Provided, further, That the lands granted or intended to be granted to the State of Arkansas by virtue of the provisions of the act of Congress' aforesaid, approved February 9th, 1853, which lie along and adjacent to the route of the Little Rock and Fort Smith branch of said Cairo and Fulton Railroad be and the sa<me are hereby granted to the Little Rock and Fort Smith Company, according to the provisions of this act, with the restrictions and limitations and rights created by this act, and no other, so far as the same are applicable to said Little Rock and Fort Smith Railroad.”

By the second section it was enacted that “ Every person who, on the 9th day of February, 1853, occupied, by residence and cultivation thereon, any tract of land comprised in the grant made by virtue of and under the provisions of such act of Congress of February 9th, 1853, may purchase from said Cairo and Fulton Railroad Company, at two dollars and fifty cents per acre, the legal subdivisions of such land as shall include his residence and actual improvements, not to exceed one quarter section, by complying with the following conditions ” — and sections three and four are as follows :

“ Section 3. Such claimant shall, within three months after said lands are selected and confirmed to said company, and a list or plat thereof filed in the recorder’s office in the county in which such lands may lie, file with the Auditor of State his own affidavit, accompanied by the affidavit of two disinterested freeholders of his county, describing the land claimed by legal subdivisions, proving the fact of such occupancy, residence and cultivation upon such legal subdivision with a view to actual cultivation and settlement,Before the day above specified, said company may, by giving reasonable notice to such claimant, appear before the Auditor and controvert the facts set forth in such affidavit, and the Auditor may swear witnesses, hear proof, and, for cause shown, set aside any such claim; Provided, That no such claim shall be set aside for misdescrijition, or error in form only, founded on mistake, but on affidavit showing such mistake, reasonable time may be given for the filing of corrected proof.
“ Sec. 4. Said claimant shall, after three months, or as soon thereafter as said company shall be in a condition to make title, pay to said company the consideration for said land, as herein-before provided, whereupon he shall be entitled to receive from said company a deed for the same, but, in case of failure to file said proof or pay said consideration money within the respective times specified, the right to make such purchase shall cease.”

And sections six and seven are as follows :

“ Section 6. Said Cairo and Fulton Railroad Company shall, within two years from the passage of this act, either grade twenty-five miles or complete ten miles of said road, at the option of said company.
“Sec. 7. This act shall be deemed a public act, and shall be favorably construed and declared for all purposes therein expressed in all courts and places whatever, and be in force whenever said company shall file with the Governor of this State' its bond, to be approved by the Governor, conditioned for the faithful performance of all the trusts and requirements in this act expressed and contained.”

Neither the Cairo and Fulton Railroad Company, nor the defendant, either graded the twenty-five miles or completed the ten miles of its road within the two years, and the General Assembly, on the 1st of February, 1859, passed the following act, entitled, “An act concerning the Cairo and Fulton Railroad and its two branches.”

“Section 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports, 1992
Harris v. Emmerling
271 S.W.2d 618 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1954)
Watson v. Harper
68 S.W.2d 1019 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1934)
Kelly v. Dewey
149 A. 840 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1930)
Adkins v. Kalter
287 S.W. 388 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1926)
State v. Cox
243 S.W. 651 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1922)
Bateman v. Southern Oregon Co.
217 F. 933 (Ninth Circuit, 1914)
Cypress Creek Drainage District v. Wolfe
158 S.W. 960 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1913)
In re Matthews
109 F. 603 (W.D. Arkansas, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Ark. 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-rock-fort-smith-r-r-v-howell-ark-1876.