Little Reb Auto Corp. v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles

93 A.D.2d 821, 460 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17663
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 4, 1983
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 93 A.D.2d 821 (Little Reb Auto Corp. v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Little Reb Auto Corp. v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, 93 A.D.2d 821, 460 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17663 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant toCPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles, which, after a hearing, found that petitioner had committed a fraud by charging for a part that had not been installed and imposed a $300 civil penalty and revoked petitioner’s repair shop license. Petition granted to the extent that the determination is modified, on the law, by vacating the penalty imposed. As so modified, determination confirmed, with costs to respondent, and the matter is remitted to the commissioner for reconsideration of the penalty, which shall in no event exceed a 30-day suspension of petitioner’s license and a $500 civil penalty. The determination that petitioner had committed a fraud is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Hannon v Cuomo, 52 NY2d 775; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc, v State Div. Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176). The record reveals that petitioner did not install the flywheel for which the customer was billed. As to the penalty of [822]*822revocation, however,- we find that insofar as it deprives petitioner of its repair shop license it is “so grave in its impact * * * that it is disproportionate to the misconduct” (see Matter of Pell v Board ofEduc., 34 NY2d 222, 234). Accordingly, the commissioner shall reconsider and impose a penalty which shall in no event exceed a 30-day suspension of petitioner’s license and a $500 civil penalty (see Rob Tess Rest. Corp. v New York State Liq. Auth., 49 NY2d 874). Damiani, J. P., Titone, Mangano and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Westbury Superstores, Ltd. v. State of New York Department of Motor Vehicles
2016 NY Slip Op 7200 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Kel-Car Associates, Ltd. v. Adduci
176 A.D.2d 942 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Lyon Coram Auto Body v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles
147 A.D.2d 564 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 A.D.2d 821, 460 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-reb-auto-corp-v-new-york-state-department-of-motor-vehicles-nyappdiv-1983.