Little Bill v. Dyslin
This text of 117 P. 487 (Little Bill v. Dyslin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action was commenced by Little Bill or Maquiqui, against Jessie A. Dyslin and others, to recover possession of' certain Puyallup Indian land in Pierce county. Prom a judgment in favor of the defendants, the plaintiff has appealed.
The issues here raised involve the same questions presented on appeal in the cause of Little Bill v. Swanson, ante p. 650, 117 Pac. 481. Upon the authority of the opinion in that cause, filed on this date, the judgment herein is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 P. 487, 64 Wash. 697, 1911 Wash. LEXIS 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-bill-v-dyslin-wash-1911.