Little Bill v. Dyslin

117 P. 487, 64 Wash. 697, 1911 Wash. LEXIS 889
Washington Supreme Court·Decided August 25, 1911·No. No. 9315·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

This action was commenced by Little Bill or Maquiqui, against Jessie A. Dyslin and others, to recover possession of' certain Puyallup Indian land in Pierce county. Prom a judgment in favor of the defendants, the plaintiff has appealed.

The issues here raised involve the same questions presented on appeal in the cause of Little Bill v. Swanson, ante p. 650, 117 Pac. 481. Upon the authority of the opinion in that cause, filed on this date, the judgment herein is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Little Bill v. Dyslin, 117 P. 487, 64 Wash. 697, 1911 Wash. LEXIS 889 (Wash. 1911).

117 P. 487 (Little Bill v. Dyslin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meyer v. Trantum
237 P. 1006 (Washington Supreme Court, 1925)