Little Bill v. Dyslin
117 P. 487, 64 Wash. 697, 1911 Wash. LEXIS 889
Opinion
This action was commenced by Little Bill or Maquiqui, against Jessie A. Dyslin and others, to recover possession of' certain Puyallup Indian land in Pierce county. Prom a judgment in favor of the defendants, the plaintiff has appealed.
The issues here raised involve the same questions presented on appeal in the cause of Little Bill v. Swanson, ante p. 650, 117 Pac. 481. Upon the authority of the opinion in that cause, filed on this date, the judgment herein is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Little Bill v. Dyslin, 117 P. 487, 64 Wash. 697, 1911 Wash. LEXIS 889 (Wash. 1911).
117 P. 487 (Little Bill v. Dyslin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Meyer v. Trantum
237 P. 1006 (Washington Supreme Court, 1925)