Little Art Corp. v. Nebraska

414 U.S. 992, 94 S. Ct. 345
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 5, 1973·No. No. 72-1576·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

Sup. Ct. Neb. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15 (1973); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49 (1973); Kaplan v. California, 413 U. S. 115 (1973); United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Film, 413 U. S. 123 (1973); United States v. Orito, 413 U. S. 139 (1973); Heller v. New York, 413 U. S. 483 (1973); Roaden v. Kentucky, 413 U. S. 496 (1973); and Alexander v. Virginia, 413 U. S. 836. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that state obscenity regulation is [993]*993prohibited by the Fourteenth and First Amendments (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (Douglas, J., dissenting)), would grant certiorari in this case and reverse the judgment of conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Little Art Corp. v. Nebraska, 414 U.S. 992, 94 S. Ct. 345 (1973).

414 U.S. 992 (Little Art Corp. v. Nebraska) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Harrold
593 N.W.2d 299 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1999)
MAIN STREET MOVIES, INC. v. Wellman
557 N.W.2d 641 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1997)
State v. Little Art Corporation
215 N.W.2d 853 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1974)